REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CONTESTED CUSTODY CASES IN MARYLAND:

THE GUIDELINES OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN

IN CASES INVOLVING CHILD CUSTODY OR CHILD ACCESS

SPECIAL VIDEO REPLAY PRESENTATIONS


Course #08-8149

Click here for a printable order form 
Please fill out the form completely and fax it to MICPEL at 410.659.0647.

6.5 CLE Hours

This 6.5-hour video replay training program meets the requirements of Rule 9-205.1 of the Maryland Rules for
attorneys who wish to qualify for appointments in child custody and child access cases, in accordance with Guideline 4
of the Maryland Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed Lawyers Representing Children in Cases Involving
Child Custody or Child Access
.

Thursday, March 20, 2008, 9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
MICPEL, The Maryland Bar Center
520 W. Fayette Street, Suite 300
Baltimore

Friday, April 4, 2008, 9:30 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.
PLEASE NOTE LOCATION CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT
ROCKVILLE VENUE

The video will no longer be shown at the Montgomery County Circuit Court Law Library.

Please note the new location:
Universities at Shady Grove Conference Center
Building I, Room 101
9640 Gudelsky Drive
Rockville

Friday, April 25, 2008, 9:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Ecker Business Training Center
(A Division of Howard Community College)
The Gateway Building
6751 Columbia Gateway Drive
Columbia

PLANNING COMMITTEE

Paul C. Berman, Ph.D.
Towson

Brenton G. Burry, Esq.
Executive Director
MICPEL

Jennifer K. Cassel, Esq.
Family Law Administrator
Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County
Annapolis

Bridget M. Gazelle
Coordinator, Family Division
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County
Upper Marlboro

Connie Kratovil-Lavelle, Esq.
Deputy Director, Family Administration
Maryland Administrative Office of the Courts
Annapolis

Dorothy J. Lennig, Esq.
Director, Domestic Violence Legal Clinic
House of Ruth of Maryland
Baltimore

Anne D. Lopiano, Esq.
Olney

Ellyn Loy
House of Ruth of Maryland
Baltimore

Christopher W. Nicholson, Esq.
Kaufman, Ries & Elgin, PA
Towson

Pamela Cardullo Ortiz, Esq.
Executive Director, Family Administration
Maryland Administrative Office of the Courts
Annapolis

Mary R. Sanders, Esq.
Turnbull & Sanders, P.A.
Towson

Keith N. Schiszik, Esq.
Day & Schiszik,
Frederick

Rebecca Snyder, Ph.D.
Frederick

John Spiegel, Esq.
Rockville

Hon. Ann N. Sundt
Circuit Court for Montgomery County
Rockville

Donna E. Van Scoy, Esq.
Rockville

Barbara R. Trader, Esq.
Salisbury

Hon. Julia B. Weatherly
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County
Upper Marlboro


Family Law Section 1-202 of the Annotated Code of Maryland (2006 Replacement Volume) provides that, in an action
in which custody, visitation rights, or the amount of support of a minor child is contested, the court may appoint a
lawyer who shall serve as a child advocate attorney to represent the minor child and who may not represent any party to
the action; or the court may appoint a lawyer who shall serve as a best interest attorney to represent the minor child and
who may not represent any party to the action; and the court may impose against either or both parents counsel fees. A
lawyer appointed under Family Law Section 1-202 shall exercise ordinary care and diligence in the representation of a
minor child.

Rule 9-205.1 of the Maryland Rules, Volume 2 (June 2007 Supplement to the June 2007 Edition) – which became
effective on July 1, 2007 - applies to the appointment of a child’s counsel in actions involving child custody or child
access. The rule lists the factors that the court should consider in determining whether to appoint child’s counsel and the
provisions that should be contained in an order appointing child’s counsel.

The Committee Note to Rule 9-205.1 states that “A court should provide for adequate and effective child’s counsel in all
cases in which an appointment is warranted, regardless of the economic status of the parties. The court should make the
appointment as soon as practicable after it determines that the appointment is warranted. A court should appoint only
lawyers who have agreed to serve in child custody and child access cases in the assigned role and have been trained in
accordance with Guideline 4 of the Maryland Guidelines for Practice for Court-Appointed Lawyers Representing
Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or Child Access. In making appointments, the court should fairly and
equitably distribute cases among all qualified attorneys, taking into account the attorney’s availability and caseload.
Before asking an attorney to provide representation pro bono publico to a child, the court should consider the number of
other similar cases the attorney has recently accepted on a pro bono basis from the court.”
This special video replay training is offered at a reduced fee by MICPEL, in cooperation with the Administrative Office
of the Courts, Department of Family Administration, and the Section of Family Law of the Maryland State Bar
Association.

Attendance at one of these three video replay training sessions will satisfy Rule 9-205.1 of the Maryland Rules
which requires that court-appointed child advocate attorneys who represent children in cases involving child
custody or child access must have been trained in accordance with Guideline 4 of the Maryland Guidelines for
Practice for Court-Appointed Lawyers Representing Children in Cases Involving Child Custody or Child
Access.


This video replay training is comprised of the original presentations that were made at the AOC-sponsored child counsel
training held on January 8, 2008 at the Maryland Judicial Conference Center in Annapolis.

AGENDA

Note: The April 4, 2008 video replay in Rockville starts 30 minutes later at 9:30 am. and ends at 5:00 p.m.

9:00 a.m. – 9:15 a.m.
Welcome & Introductions

9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m.
The Role of the Child’s Attorney Under the Guidelines - Roles & Responsibilities; Best Interest Attorney Litigates Rather Than
Reports; Definition of Considered Judgment; Liability; Orders of Appointment

9:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
Child Development and Communication - Development, Needs & Abilities; Cognitive Ability, Mental & Emotional
Development; Context for Healthy Development; What Happens When Needs Are Not Met?; Implications for Parenting Plans;
Communications with the Child Client in Developmentally Appropriate Manner; Interview Techniques

11:00 a.m. – 11:15 a.m.
Break

11:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.
Questions & Answers on Child Development Issues

11:30 a.m. – 12:15 p.m.
Impact of Family Dysfunction, Child Abuse, Neglect, Substance Abuse, and Domestic Violence on Children & Implications for
Pediatric Legal Practice
– Evaluating What is in a Child’s Best Interest; Recognizing Abuse That is Not Physical; Coercive/Control
Issues; Impact of Witnessing Family Violence

12:15 p.m. – 12:30 p.m.
Questions & Answers on Special Issues

12:30 p.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Lunch (on your own)

1:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Calling in the Experts: Using Other Professionals to Enhance Your Understanding of Your Client’s Needs & Your Client’s Case
– Forensic Custody & Mental Health Evaluators; Substance Abuse Evaluations; Understanding & Addressing Educational Needs;
Identifying & Addressing Special Needs; Use of Other Experts; Identifying Best Practices

2:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Tapping Local Resources – Available Court and Community-Based Resources

2:30 p.m. – 3:45 p.m.
Representing Your Client Effectively – Representational Issues; Evidentiary Concerns; Ethical Issues; Preparing and Presenting a
Child’s Viewpoint; Child Testimony and Alternatives to Direct Testimony; Your Role with Self-Represented Litigants; Dealing
with High Conflict Families

3:45 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Questions & Answers for Practitioners

4:00 p.m. – 4:15 p.m.
A View From the Bench

4:15 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Questions & Answers for the Judges

4:30 p.m.
Adjourn

Tuition:  Registration Fee for All Attendees is $109.

Click here for a printable order form 
Please fill out the form completely and fax it to MICPEL at 410.659.0647.

 

< < < Back to Seminars